Skip to Content

As a result of the current Federal government funding situation, the information on this website may not be up to date or acted upon.

The NIH Clinical Center (the research hospital of NIH) is open. For more details about its operating status, please visit

Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at

Discovering the causes of cancer and the means of prevention

Publications Search - Abstract View

Title: Socio-economic status and oesophageal cancer: results from a population-based case-control study in a high-risk area.
Authors: Islami F,  Kamangar F,  Nasrollahzadeh D,  Aghcheli K,  Sotoudeh M,  Abedi-Ardekani B,  Merat S,  Nasseri-Moghaddam S,  Semnani S,  Sepehr A,  Wakefield J,  Møller H,  Abnet CC,  Dawsey SM,  Boffetta P,  Malekzadeh R
Journal: Int J Epidemiol
Date: 2009 Aug
Branches: MEB
PubMed ID: 19416955
PMC ID: PMC2720396
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cancer registries in the 1970s showed that parts of Golestan Province in Iran had the highest rate of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the world. More recent studies have shown that while rates are still high, they are approximately half of what they were before, which might be attributable to improved socio-economic status (SES) and living conditions in this area. We examined a wide range of SES indicators to investigate the association between different SES components and risk of OSCC in the region. METHODS: Data were obtained from a population-based case-control study conducted between 2003 and 2007 with 300 histologically proven OSCC cases and 571 matched neighbourhood controls. We used conditional logistic regression to compare cases and controls for individual SES indicators, for a composite wealth score constructed using multiple correspondence analysis, and for factors obtained from factors analysis. RESULTS: We found that various dimensions of SES, such as education, wealth and being married were all inversely related to OSCC. The strongest inverse association was found with education. Compared with no education, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for primary education and high school or beyond were 0.52 (0.27-0.98) and 0.20 (0.06-0.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The strong association of SES with OSCC after adjustment for known risk factors implies the presence of yet unidentified risk factors that are correlated with our SES measures; identification of these factors could be the target of future studies. Our results also emphasize the importance of using multiple SES measures in epidemiological studies.