Skip to Content

As a result of the current Federal government funding situation, the information on this website may not be up to date or acted upon.

The NIH Clinical Center (the research hospital of NIH) is open. For more details about its operating status, please visit

Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at

Discovering the causes of cancer and the means of prevention

Publications Search - Abstract View

Title: Analysis of serum metabolic profiles in women with endometrial cancer and controls in a population-based case-control study.
Authors: Gaudet MM,  Falk RT,  Stevens RD,  Gunter MJ,  Bain JR,  Pfeiffer RM,  Potischman N,  Lissowska J,  Peplonska B,  Brinton LA,  Garcia-Closas M,  Newgard CB,  Sherman ME
Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Date: 2012 Sep
Branches: BB, MEB, OD, OEEB, REB
PubMed ID: 22730518
PMC ID: PMC3431573
Abstract: CONTEXT: Endometrial cancer is associated with metabolic disturbances related to its underlying risk factors, including obesity and diabetes. Identifying metabolite biomarkers associated with endometrial cancer may have value for early detection, risk assessment, and understanding etiology. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the reliable measurement of metabolites in epidemiological studies with nonstandardized blood collection; confirm previously reported correlations of metabolites with body size; and assess differences in metabolite levels between cases and controls. DESIGN: This was the Polish Endometrial Cancer Study (2001-2003). SETTING: This study was a population-based case-control study. PATIENTS: Patients included 250 cases and 250 controls. INTERVENTION: The intervention included the measurement of serum metabolite levels of 15 amino acids, 45 acylcarnitines, and nine fatty acids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was endometrial cancer. RESULTS: Body mass index was correlated with levels of valine (r = 0.26, P = 3.4 10(-5)), octenoylcarnitine (r = 0.24, P = 1.5 10(-4)), palmitic acid (r = 0.26, P = 4.4 10(-5)), oleic acid (r = 0.28, P = 9.9 10(-6)), and stearic acid (r = 0.26, P = 2.9 10(-5)) among controls. Only stearic acid was inversely associated with endometrial cancer case status (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1: odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.69, P for trend = 1.2 10(-4)). Levels of the C5-acylcarnitines, octenoylcarnitine, decatrienoylcarnitine, and linoleic acid were significantly lower in cases than controls (odds ratios ranged from 0.21 to 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that previously reported variations in metabolomic profiles with body mass index can be replicated in population-based studies with nonfasting blood collection protocols. We also provide preliminary evidence that large differences in metabolite levels exist between cases and controls, independent of body habitus. Our findings warrant assessment of metabolic profiles, including the candidate markers identified herein, in prospectively collected blood samples to define biomarkers and etiological factors related to endometrial cancer.