Atlas of Cancer Mortality
Materials and Methods --
Calculation of age-adjusted cancer mortality rates
For each form of cancer, the age-adjusted (direct method, 1970 U.S.
population standard--see
Appendix Table 4)
mortality rate R per
100,000 person-years was calculated by race, sex, and geographic
area for each of the time periods 1970-94 and 1950-69, as follows:
3,11,12
R= 100,000* SUM (wiri)
= 100,000* SUM (widi/ni)
where
- i= 18 age groups 0-4, 5-9,..., 85+
- wi= the proportion of the standard population in age group i
- ri= the age-specific rate di/ni
- di= the number of deaths in age group i
- ni= the person-years in age-group i
The binomial approximation to the variance of the age-adjusted rate
was calculated as:
var (R)= 100,0002*
SUM [wi2ri(1-ri)/ni].
The 95 percent confidence limits of R were calculated from the
square root of the variance as:
R±1.96[var(R)]½
A negative lower confidence limit was replaced by zero. For an area
with zero deaths, the rate R was zero and the var (R) was estimated
using the national rate. An area-specific age-adjusted rate was
deemed significantly different statistically from the U.S.
age-adjusted rate if their confidence limits did not overlap.
Detailed area-specific data are not presented in this Atlas but are
available from the NCI and from the NCI Atlas Static Web site.
Expected numbers of deaths from cancer for each geographic area by
race and sex were the sums over age groups of the corresponding
national age-specific rates times the age-specific person-years for
each area by race and sex.
Male/female and black/white rate ratios (R1/R2) were calculated
using the national age-adjusted rates rounded to two digits after
the decimal point. The 95 percent confidence limits on the rate
ratios are not presented but may be calculated as:
13
exp[ln(R1/R2)±1.96
(1/D1+1/D2)½]
where
- exp[x]=ex,
- ln[x]=the natural logarithm of x, and
- D1,D2=the deaths associated with
R1,R2 respectively
Maximum likelihood estimates of the relative risk standard
deviations (RRSDs) and their standard errors (SEs) were calculated
under the assumption of a mixed effects model. The RRSDs provide a
measure of the standard deviation of the underlying area-specific
relative risks and serve as quantitative indices to compare
geographic variation across maps.14
| References |
| 3. |
Pickle LW, Mason TJ, Howard N, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF Jr. Atlas of U.S. cancer mortality among whites: 1950-1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov. Printing Office; 1987. DHHS Publ. No. (NIH) 87-2900.
|
| 11. |
Chiang CL. Standard error of the age-adjusted death rate. Vital Stat Selected Rep 1961;47:275-85.
|
| 12. |
Boyle P, Parkin DM. Statistical methods for registries. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, et al., editors. Cancer registration: Principles and methods. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1991. p. 126-58. IARC Scientific Publ. No. 95.
|
| 13. |
Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
|
| 14. |
Pennello GA, Devesa SS, Gail MH. Using a mixed model to estimate geographic variation in cancer rates. Biometrics 1999; 55:774-81.
|
Suggested Citation
Devesa SS, Grauman DG, Blot WJ, Pennello G, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF Jr. Atlas of cancer
mortality in the United States, 1950-94. Washington, DC: US Govt Print Off; 1999 [NIH Publ No.
(NIH) 99-4564].
|