Skip to Content

Publications Search - Abstract View

Title: Using multiple imputation to assign pesticide use for non-responders in the follow-up questionnaire in the Agricultural Health Study.
Authors: Heltshe SL,  Lubin JH,  Koutros S,  Coble JB,  Ji BT,  Alavanja MC,  Blair A,  Sandler DP,  Hines CJ,  Thomas KW,  Barker J,  Andreotti G,  Hoppin JA,  Beane Freeman LE
Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol
Date: 2012 Jul
Branches: BB, OEEB
PubMed ID: 22569205
PMC ID: PMC3396426
Abstract: The Agricultural Health Study (AHS), a large prospective cohort, was designed to elucidate associations between pesticide use and other agricultural exposures and health outcomes. The cohort includes 57,310 pesticide applicators who were enrolled between 1993 and 1997 in Iowa and North Carolina. A follow-up questionnaire administered 5 years later was completed by 36,342 (63%) of the original participants. Missing pesticide use information from participants who did not complete the second questionnaire impedes both long-term pesticide exposure estimation and statistical inference of risk for health outcomes. Logistic regression and stratified sampling were used to impute key variables related to the use of specific pesticides for 20,968 applicators who did not complete the second questionnaire. To assess the imputation procedure, a 20% random sample of participants was withheld for comparison. The observed and imputed prevalence of any pesticide use in the holdout dataset were 85.7% and 85.3%, respectively. The distribution of prevalence and days/year of use for specific pesticides were similar across observed and imputed in the holdout sample. When appropriately implemented, multiple imputation can reduce bias and increase precision and can be more valid than other missing data approaches.