||Amankwah EK, Kelemen LE, Wang Q, Song H, Chenevix-Trench G, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Beesley J, Webb PM, Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer), Pearce CL, Wu AH, Pike MC, Stram DO, Chang-Claude J, Wang-Gohrke S, Ness RB, Goode EL, Cunningham JM, Fridley BL, Vierkant RA, Tworoger SS, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, Sieh W, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Ramus SJ, Rossing MA, Doherty JA, Goodman MT, Carney ME, Lurie G, Wilkens LR, KjÃ¦r SK, HÃ¸gdall E, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Garcia-Closas M, Yang H, Lissowska J, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Pharoah PD, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
||BACKGROUND: We previously reported an association between rs2660753, a prostate cancer susceptibility polymorphism, and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC; OR = 1.2, 95% CI=1.0-1.4, P(trend) = 0.01) that showed a stronger association with the serous histological subtype (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.5, P(trend) = 0.003). METHODS: We sought to replicate this association in 12 other studies comprising 4,482 cases and 6,894 controls of white non-Hispanic ancestry in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. RESULTS: No evidence for an association with all cancers or serous cancers was observed in a combined analysis of data from the replication studies (all: OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.9-1.1, P(trend) = 0.61; serous: OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.9-1.1, P(trend) = 0.85) or from the combined analysis of discovery and replication studies (all: OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 1.0-1.1, P(trend) = 0.28; serous: OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.2, P(trend) = 0.11). There was no evidence for statistical heterogeneity in ORs across the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although rs2660753 is a strong prostate cancer susceptibility polymorphism, the association with another hormonally related cancer, invasive EOC, is not supported by this replication study. IMPACT: Our findings, based on a larger sample size, emphasize the importance of replicating potentially promising genetic risk associations.